Redcliffe Residents Oppose Seven-Storey Waterfront Plan on Marine Parade

Redcliffe Residents Oppose Seven-Storey Waterfront Plan on Marine Parade

Redcliffe residents have raised significant objections to a proposed seven-storey apartment building on Marine Parade, arguing the development contradicts existing council planning policies and undermines community consultation.



Community Concerns Surface

Redcliffe Residents Oppose Seven-Storey Waterfront Plan on Marine Parade
Photo Credit: DA/2024/4695

Ian Flint, representing the Waves body corporate committee, conveyed residents’ “deep concerns” during a recent Moreton Bay City Council meeting. He highlighted that the development application for 25 Marine Parade, which outlines plans for five apartments spread across seven levels, including parking and a rooftop terrace, has stirred unease within the community. As Mr Flint expressed, the core issue centres on the perceived overdevelopment of the Redcliffe Peninsula.

He argued that the area is already experiencing substantial high-density residential growth, with numerous high-rise buildings either existing, under construction, or recently approved. Residents question the suitability of another tall building on a relatively small block, particularly given its proximity to existing properties.

Increase Your Business Profile

Policy and Process Criticised

Redcliffe Residents Oppose Seven-Storey Waterfront Plan on Marine Parade
Photo Credit: DA/2024/4695

A central point of contention concerns the perceived inconsistency between the proposed development and the council’s planning policies. Mr Flint asserted that the council’s own guidelines suggest a two- to three-storey building would be more appropriate for the location. The proposed seven-storey structure, therefore, raises questions regarding planning consistency and transparency.

Join Mailing List

Local Resources

Furthermore, the development application’s classification as code assessable, rather than impact assessable, has drawn criticism. This classification meant that affected residents and stakeholders were not formally notified of the application, nor were they allowed to lodge formal objections. 

Mr Flint stated that the lack of community consultation undermines confidence in the planning process and denies those directly affected a voice in decisions that will significantly impact their homes and quality of life.



Practical Implications Raised

Beyond policy concerns, residents have also raised practical issues. Specifically, they expressed apprehension about the placement of waste collection bins in the new development.

The proposed location, which fronts onto a pedestrian crossing and directly in front of the existing Waves building, is viewed as problematic. Residents believe this placement will create an obstruction and inconvenience for pedestrians.

Published Date 27-Feb-2025



Spread the love