Woody Point Rough Sleepers Face Strict Bans on Pets and Camping

Woody Point Rough Sleepers Face Strict Bans on Pets and Camping

Rough sleepers at Gayundah Arboretum Park in Woody Point have been issued notices banning pets and vehicle-based camping, with fines of up to $8,065 for non-compliance.



New Rules Spark Backlash

On 12 December, the City of Moreton Bay approved changes to its Persons Experiencing Homelessness Camping Framework, enforcing stricter measures to address illegal camping. These rules prohibit rough sleepers from keeping pets and using vehicles, including vans and caravans, as makeshift homes in public areas.

The changes, allegedly implemented without public consultation, have caused concern among community groups. Advocates warn that the measures, while addressing safety concerns, may lead to further hardship for vulnerable individuals with limited housing options.

Increase Your Business Profile

Paul Slater, a community advocate from Northwest Community Group, Inc, highlighted the immediate impact, stating that some individuals have been given just two days to vacate the area. He noted that many vehicles used for shelter are non-operational, leaving their owners with nowhere else to go.

Join Mailing List

Local Resources

“This change was made without warning or consultation with their community. This change was made without consultation with community groups or services,” Mr Slater’s group said, in a statement.

“These changes are life changing for a number of people sleeping rough in that area. Some of these people have been sleeping rough for a long period of time while they wait for social housing or other viable options. They are living in vehicles that no longer drive, but are able to provide them with safety and security.”

Emotional and Practical Fallout

The prohibition on pets has been particularly distressing for those affected. Many people experiencing housing insercurity rely on their animals for emotional support and companionship, especially after losing contact with friends and family. Local advocates worry that the forced separation from pets could lead to anxiety, depression, and a loss of safety for those sleeping rough.

“Pets are extremely important to people sleeping rough. Many of them have lost contact with all friends and family, and their pets are all they have left. Even the thought of losing their pets can be triggering for them, and can lead to depression and anxiety.”

Tameika Brittnee, a woman living in a tent at Woody Point, said her dog provided a sense of security she couldn’t find elsewhere. Community workers emphasise that such bonds are crucial for mental health, especially during a crisis.

Limited Alternatives for the Displaced

Council has defended the measures, citing safety issues, including dog attacks and anti-social behaviour in public spaces. Mr Peter Flannery stated that the influx of campers in the Moreton Bay region has created risks for residents and visitors, particularly during the holiday season.

Council suggested that displaced individuals could relocate to caravan parks or national parks. However, these options are widely criticised as unrealistic. Local caravan parks are reportedly full, and the costs, often exceeding $200 per week for unpowered sites, are unaffordable for most on limited incomes.

Advocates argue that these measures ignore the systemic lack of affordable housing and create further barriers for individuals seeking stability. Many people affected have been on waiting lists for social housing for years, relying on vehicles or temporary structures for shelter.

Community Response and Calls for Change

The measures have drawn criticism from local charities and advocates who describe them as punitive and lacking compassion. Community groups are urging the council to collaborate with state and federal governments to address the root causes rather than imposing fines and restrictive rules.

Advocates are calling on residents to contact their city officials and demand a more empathetic approach, particularly during the holiday season when those without homes face heightened challenges.



“While these new rules are intended to prompt the federal government to address the housing crisis, they fail to consider the individuals caught in the middle of these political maneuvers. This approach seems more focused on tidying up the waterfront for Christmas than on the real needs of our community members who are struggling.

“This decision by the council and the mayor not only impacts those living in these vehicles but also complicates the efforts of services like mine, the council’s homeless liaison team, the Encircles HOAP team, and the breakfast club’s outreach team. Dispersing these individuals makes it significantly harder for us to connect with them and provide the support they desperately need.

“It’s time to prioritize compassion and community over appearances. Let’s advocate for solutions that truly help those in need!” per a post from Nourish Street Inc, an advocacy group.

Published 19-Dec-2024